| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Editor's Notes |
This excerpt was created in the absence of an abstract.
When 1999 comes to a close, there will be little time for reflection on the immediate. Like all people on the planet, I will be forced to deal with more monumental issues as I contemplate the new millennium. But what about this year? Where do we stand as we enter 1999? Will the Y2K problem really change life as we know it?
I wonder how the Journal should prepare for the new millenium. Journals are supposed to be fonts of information, suppliers of evidence and insight, and arenas for dialogue and discussion. The emphasis is on communicating with readers. But how can we hope to achieve these lofty goals unless we also undergo scrutiny by all those we claim to serve? The Journal reviews manuscripts; you should review the Journal.
Like many Journals, we seek to better understand our performance by conducting reader surveys....
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?