Vol. 78, No. 12, December 1998, pp. 1288-1298
Research Reports |
A Comparison of Productivity and Learning Outcome in Individual and Cooperative Physical Therapy Clinical Education Models
RK Ladyshewsky, MHSc, BMR(PT), is Lecturer and Clinical Coordinator—Development, School of Physiotherapy, Curtin University of Technology, Selby Street, Shenton Park, Western Australia 6008, Australia (r.ladyshewsky@info.curtin.edu.au), and Honorary Research Associate, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
SC Barrie, BSc(Hons), is Lecturer, Centre for Teaching and Learning, University of Sydney.
VM Drake, MSc, is Lecturer and Clinical Coordinator, School of Occupational Therapy, Curtin University of Technology.
Background and Purpose. This program evaluation was designed to evaluate productivity and the learning processes used during individual and cooperative clinical education experiences. Subjects and Methods. Clinical instructors (n=23) and senior students (n=20) at the bachelor's degree level who were engaged in an individual learning experience at an Australian school provided workload productivity data on their daily patient care, administration, and teaching activities. An evaluation of the teaching and learning processes was conducted via questionnaire at the end of the experience. This same information was provided by a group of clinical instructors (n=8) and senior students (n=16) who were engaged in a cooperative learning experience. Results. Clinical instructors in both learning experiences had to reduce their normal levels of productivity to supervise the students. The amount of patient care provided by students, however, compensated for this reduction in clinical instructor productivity. The extent of productivity gains in areas other than patient care were greater for the cooperative learning experience. Clinical instructors and students rated the individual and cooperative learning experiences similarly, although the students rated 3 particular learning processes more highly in the cooperative learning experience. Conclusion and Discussion. Advantages with respect to patient care, teaching, and administrative productivity were identified for each learning experience. From the perspective of the students, the cooperative learning experience appeared to provide additional educational benefits.
Key Words: Cooperative learning • Education: physical therapist, clinical education • Learning
Related Articles
CiteULike 
Complore 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us 
Digg 
Reddit 
Technorati What's this?
Physical Therapy 1998 78: 1299-1300.
Physical Therapy 1998 78: 1300-1301.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  L. M Fitzgerald, A. Delitto, and J. J Irrgang Validation of the Clinical Internship Evaluation Tool Physical Therapy, July 1, 2007; 87(7): 844 - 860. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Strohschein, P. Hagler, and L. May Assessing the Need for Change in Clinical Education Practices Physical Therapy, February 1, 2002; 82(2): 160 - 172. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|